Eva Marie Voracek vs Daniel Hefner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do both players fare on their second serve? Daniel Hefner has a lower success rate with 31.25%, while Eva Marie Voracek has a better performance at 39.00%.
• When it comes to returning second serves, Daniel Hefner edges slightly ahead with 47.95% compared to Eva Marie Voracek's 47.77%.
• Who performs better on first serve returns? Daniel Hefner leads with 38.84%, while Eva Marie Voracek has 35.66%.
• Under pressure during breakpoints, Daniel Hefner manages to save 46.15%, narrowly outperforming Eva Marie Voracek's 45.94%.
• In terms of matches won over the past year, Eva Marie Voracek shows a stronger performance with a 66.67% win rate compared to Daniel Hefner's 50.00%.
• Considering surface preferences, Daniel Hefner's best performance is on Hard courts with a 47% win rate, whereas Eva Marie Voracek shows her strength on Clay, achieving 47% wins.
• Level of competition shows Eva Marie Voracek excelled more in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, with a 71.43% win rate over Daniel Hefner's 57.14%.
• Looking at opponent ranking, Daniel Hefner faced tougher opponents, with their average rank being 91.25, compared to Eva Marie Voracek's 381.2.
• How do they fare in deciding sets? Daniel Hefner has won 67% of deciding sets, outperforming Eva Marie Voracek's 48% win rate.
• In breakpoint conversion, Daniel Hefner capitalizes on 47.62% of opportunities, surpassing Eva Marie Voracek who converts 41.58%.

Editorial Prediction (November 26, 2025, UTC):

In recent months, Eva Marie Voracek has shown superior performance on her second serve and overall match wins, which could indicate a stronger position going into the match. Her historical success on clay surfaces contrasts with Hefner's hard court preference, which could factor into the match outcome depending on the surface being played.

When evaluating return games and breakpoint scenarios, Hefner appears to have a slight edge, particularly in converting breakpoints and performing in high-pressure situations. His ability to win deciding sets could also be a decisive factor if the match becomes closely contested.

Considering the overall performance metrics and level of competition faced, even though Voracek shows promise with a higher win percentage, Hefner's edge in return stats, breakpoint conversion, and deciding set performance may tip the scales in his favor for this match.

In conclusion, while both players showcase strengths in different areas, Daniel Hefner is predicted to be the likely winner of the upcoming tennis match, given his slight advantages in critical areas of the game.